THE OKLAHOMA BAR JOURNAL 48 | JANUARY 2026 Statements or opinions expressed in the Oklahoma Bar Journal are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Oklahoma Bar Association, its officers, Board of Governors, Board of Editors or staff. TRIBAL CUSTOMARY MARRIAGE: VALID THEN AND NOW Suppose a man is a member of an Oklahoma tribe, as is the woman he wishes to marry. Rather than going to a courthouse for a license or simply telling everyone (including the IRS) that they are married, the couple goes through a cultural ceremony, where an elder and the community that gathers provide a blessing and recognition. Perhaps he playfully tossed pebbles at the woman he wanted to marry to get her attention, like in traditional Choctaw culture. Perhaps he provided gifts, like horses, to her father, like in traditional cultures of certain Plains tribes, including the Osage, Kiowa and Comanche. This “marriage” is based upon the customs of the particular tribe(s). Professor Matthew L.M. Fletcher noted these applications of customary and traditional laws and how, even in tribal courts, the concepts are hard to recognize and enforce.9 Almost 100 years ago, the Oklahoma Supreme Court in Coker v. Moore recognized that “marriages, contracted between tribal Indians according to the usages and customs of their tribe, at a time when the tribal government and relations are existing, will be upheld by the courts, in the absence of a federal law rendering invalid the laws and customs of the tribe.”10 That is, a tribal customary marriage has been and continues to be valid in Oklahoma. In its most simplistic form, a tribal customary marriage involves the intent of the parties to be married and some kind of tribal recognition, either through a public ceremony or even an informal acknowledgment. As the Oklahoma Supreme Court said in 1936, “In marriage by tribal custom the consent may be either expressed or implied, but nevertheless there must be some fact or circumstance inferring such necessary consent.”11 In the Allen case, the court also noted how the Congressional Act of May 2, 1890, only legitimized tribal customary marriages that were recognized by the tribes COMPARATIVE SUMMARY Factor Licensed Marriage Common-Law Marriage Tribal Customary Marriage Legal Definition “Personal relation arising out of a civil contract” (43 O.S. §1) “Minds of the parties meet in consent at the same time” (Standefer) “Marriages ... according to usages and customs of their tribe” (Coker) License Required? Yes (mandatory) No Depends on tribal law Ceremony Required? Yes (with two witnesses) No Varies by tribe Proof Standard Automatic upon filing “Clear and convincing evidence” (Standefer) Tribal certification or proof of custom under tribal law Timing Requirement Formal ceremony required “Present assumption of existing relationship” (Hornback) Varies by tribal custom and law Cost $5-50 Litigation costs if disputed Varies (often minimal or free) Who Can Marry? Any eligible resident Any eligible resident Tribal citizens (rules vary by tribe) Governing Authority 43 O.S. §§1-7 Standefer, Reaves and Maxfield Tribal codes, Coker and Allen recognition and federal sovereignty (Martinez, William and CFR) State Recognition All 50 states and international Oklahoma and most states (if proven) Oklahoma (12 O.S. §728) and federal law Cultural Significance Secular/religious blend Relationship-based autonomy Preservation of Indigenous traditions and tribal self-determination
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy OTk3MQ==