Bless
This Messy Desk By Jim Calloway, Director, OBA Management Assistance
Program
In some ways, opinions about general tidiness or messiness
of your desk can be as divisive as any of today’s great political
issues. Those who tend to keep a tidy desk have a difficult time
restraining themselves from commenting when they see another lawyer’s
desk containing piles of paperwork. By the same token, many other
lawyers see a lawyer’s desk with all of the desktop wood exposed
and tend to think there may be something a little bit wrong with
that person.
Riding to the rescue of the messy desk crew is a recent
book titled A Perfect Mess by Eric Abrahamson and David
W. Friedman (2006). In this book, the authors deliver the counterpoints
to all of the rules promulgated by the time management experts and
the rapidly growing
community of professional organizers. Messy
workspaces, they argue, may not be all that bad.
Certainly our society tends to look down on people
with messy desks. They are thought to be slovenly, disorganized and
less productive than others. You really cannot imagine the president
of the United States delivering a nationally-televised address behind
a desk with an overflowing inbox, a stack of a dozen file folders,
a few dozen strategically-placed Post-it notes and the leftovers
from lunch. (Of course, many of you are probably thinking that if
you had as many staff people working for you as the president does,
your desk would be clean, too.)
A story in USA Today
quoted an individual as
saying that there were “uncountable hours lost each year” due to
disorganization.1 But, have you ever noticed that the individuals giving those
quotes to the media are almost all professional organizers? These people make
their living from convincing others that they need to pay these people to clean
their desks, shelves and cabinets.
Does a messy desk really equate to disorganization?
Not so, according to the authors of A Perfect Mess.
“A messy desk can be a highly effective prioritizing
and accessing system…. In general, on the messy desk, the
more important, more urgent work tends to stay close by and near
the top of the clutter, while the safely ignorable stuff tends to
get buried at the bottom or near the back, which makes perfect sense.”2
So maybe the views of messy desks critics are not correct
at all, but are merely the “neatnicks” way of stifling
the impressive creative power of the “messies.”
A survey from Ajilon Office says messiness increases
with increasing education, increasing salary and increasing experience.
In fact, survey results found that “[t]he higher the salary, the messier
the person: 66 percent of Americans making $35,000 or less per year are self-described ‘neat
freaks,’ whereas only 11 percent of those earning above $75,000 claim
the same.”3 The idea that people with messy desks make more money would
certainly
resonate with many of us.
You may recall that Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin
accidentally when he returned to his cluttered office after being
out for several days and found something unusual in a petri dish.
Even the staunchest proponent of the messy desk would probably have
to concede that when items on a lawyer’s desk start growing
mold, it is time for a reevaluation of your methods.
One of my personal challenges is dealing with the huge
amount of new information that is available each month on technology
and management. As I am preparing this article, a significant component
of the mess on my desk is magazines open to half-read
articles. A few bookmarks could obviously resolve that part of the mess. But
what I would really like is to find time to finish the reading.
I think that’s really the cause of most of the
messy desks. If we had an unlimited amount of time, we would probably
be happy to neatly file everything in its place. In real life, however,
one sometimes tends to find themselves rushing from one filing deadline
to one court appearance back to one client appointment. Most of the
mess is actually things that are uncompleted items. Rather than filing
them somewhere, we just want to finish the work.
(I have also noticed that those of us with messy desks
may also have messy Windows Desktops. That may become a topic for
an
entirely different article.)
Unfortunately, it is not within my power to grant absolution
to those of you with messy desks. First of all, disorganization within
the law office is not a good thing. I am willing to concede that
not all desks that appear to be messy are truly evidence of disorganization.
But we have to be honest and admit that some messy desks are a symptom
of greater problems.
Secondly, as lawyers we want to develop broad client
bases, representing people from all walks of life. While potential
clients belonging to the “messy” persuasion may be quite
content to be
represented by a “neatnik” lawyer, the reverse is often not true.
You would really hate to lose the opportunity for the most lucrative case of
the year just because the client happened to schedule the initial meeting during
an extra messy period.
I am aware that some habitually messy lawyers have
found an easy solution to this problem. They just maintain two offices.
One is for work and can become extremely cluttered. The other is
the “client interview office” where things are kept very
neat and orderly. While this may seem to be a bit extreme,
I guess it
is better than losing the business
altogether.
Since I am a frequent sufferer of Messy Desk Syndrome,
I am perhaps not the best source of assistance on this topic. But
since you’ve already invested close to half of a billable hour
in reading this far, here are a few ideas.
1 If you only have an inbox and outbox on your desk,
perhaps you could appear a little better organized (and maybe even
become so) by adding a couple of extra boxes for papers. One could
be called “Pending” and the other “Urgent.”
I know from experience that one of the primary reasons
why we keep things on our desk is that we are fearful we will forget
about the task that needs to be done if we move them out of sight.
A pile of papers or files stacked in a box appears more organized,
making us and our office visitors feel better. Prioritizing certain
things as pending and others as urgent is actually a very effective
and useful management technique.
2 Work from the lists, not from files. Keeping a list
of all current projects and assignments is a key step toward organization
and allowing you to move some of those file folders off of your desk
and back into the file cabinets. Many readers right now have a file
on their desk for no other reason than to remind them to make a telephone
call. Write down the name, the number and the
reason for the call on your to do list and let the file find its way back to
the file
cabinet.
3 Implement practice management software. I know that
this may begin to sound like a broken record from me for some of
you. But the more information that you keep on your computer system,
the less physical bits of paper you will have cluttering up your
desk. There are now many lawyers who scan all of the paper that comes
into their office and largely worked from virtual files on their
computer systems. While this is a great idea, the most important
part of the idea is that it the information that is normally contained
on calendars, Rolodexes, 3 x 5 cards, Post-it notes and other scraps
of paper is all maintained within your practice management system.
Do that as a first priority and make the final conversion to the
paperless office a future goal.
Just remember the lessons from the book. The appearance
of messiness may not be a bad thing. The issue is how organized you
are and how well your office systems function. If everything is moving
along smoothly, then feel free to tell the next person who comments
on your messy desk, “By the way, did you know that we make
more money than you do?”
1. USA Today, Jan. 22, 2006 Consequences of Messy Desks http://tinyurl.com/22u6tb 2.
A Perfect Mess page 30
3. What Does Your Desk Say About You? Are You A “Neat Freak” Or
A “Clutter Bug” At The Office? www.ajilonoffice.com
http://tinyurl.com/2asxfp
Originally published in the Oklahoma Bar Journal Feb.
10, 2007 - Vol. 78; No.06 |