|
ORPC Changes at a Glance
By Gina Hendryx, OBA Ethics Counsel
Amendments to the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct
as approved by the Oklahoma Supreme Court will become effective Jan.
1, 2008. These changes were prompted by extensive updates to the
ABA’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct. The current Oklahoma
rules are based substantially on the ABA Model Rules and the adopted
amendments reflect these updates as well as current Oklahoma modifications.
The following is a brief summary of a few of the rule
changes.
Rule 1.2 Scope of
Representation and
Allocation of Authority Between Client and Lawyer
Language from the model rule was added to permit a
lawyer to take action on behalf of the client that is impliedly authorized
to carry out the representation. A lawyer may also limit the scope
of the representation if the limitation is reasonable under the circumstances
and the client gives informed consent.
Rule 1.4 Communication
This amended rule clarifies and specifies a lawyer’s
duty to communicate with the client. The lawyer shall promptly inform
the client of any decision or circumstance which requires the client’s
informed consent and shall reasonably consult with the client about
the means by which the client’s objectives are to be accomplished.
Comment [4] states that when a client makes a reasonable request
for information, prompt compliance is required from the lawyer. However,
if a prompt response is not feasible, the lawyer or a member of the
lawyer’s staff shall acknowledge receipt of the request and
advise the client when a response may be expected. Client telephone
calls should be promptly returned or acknowledged.
Rule 1.5 Fees
A lawyer shall not make an agreement for, charge or
collect an unreasonable fee or an unreasonable amount of expenses.
The scope of the representation and the basis or rate of the fee
and expenses for which the client will be responsible shall be communicated
to the client, preferably in writing, before or within a reasonable
time after commencing the representation, except when the lawyer
will charge a regularly represented client on the same basis or rate.
Any changes in the basis or rate of the fee or expenses shall also
be communicated to the client. The contingent fee agreement shall
be in writing and signed by the client. The contingent fee agreement
must clearly notify the client of any expenses for which the client
will be liable whether or not the client is the prevailing party.
This rule permits division of a legal fee between
lawyers who are not in the same firm. The division may be made if
it is in proportion to the services performed by each lawyer or if
each lawyer assumes joint responsibility for the representation.
The client must agree to the arrangement and the agreement must be
confirmed in writing. Joint responsibility for the representation
entails financial and ethical responsibility for the representation
as if the lawyers were associated in a partnership.
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
There will be significant changes to this rule as
of Jan. 1. Rule 1.6 governs the disclosure by a lawyer of information
relating to the representation of a client. The new amendments permit
an attorney to disclose information in certain circumstances to prevent
reasonably certain death or substantial bodily harm, to prevent the
client from committing a crime or a fraud that is reasonably certain
to result in substantial injury to the financial or property interests
of another in furtherance of which the client has used the lawyer’s
services. The rule will also permit disclosure of confidential information
so that the lawyer may obtain advice on the lawyer’s compliance
with the Rules of Professional Conduct.
Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest: Current
Clients
Rule 1.7 prohibits representing a client if the representation
involves a concurrent conflict of interest with limited exceptions.
A concurrent conflict of interest exists if the representation of
one client will be directly adverse to another client. If the representation
meets one of the exceptions, each affected client must give informed
consent, confirmed in writing to the representation.
Rule 1.8 Conflict of
Interest: Current Clients:
Specific Rules
Amendments to Rule 1.8 include language in (c) clarifying
who are “related persons” for the purpose of preparing
instruments giving the lawyer or a person related to the lawyer a
substantial gift. Rule 1.8 will permit a lawyer to pay court costs
and litigation expenses on behalf of an indigent client. Rule 1.8(j)
adds language that expressly prohibits sexual relations between a
lawyer and a client unless: (1) a consensual sexual relationship
existed between them when the client-lawyer relationship commenced
and (2) the relationship does not result in a violation of Rule 1.7(a)(2).
The full text of these and all the amendments can be found at www.okbar.org/ethics/ORPC.
Further information on additional rule amendments will be summarized
in the October and December Oklahoma Bar Journal theme issues.
Have an ethics question? It’s a member benefit,
and all inquiries are confidential. Contact Ms. Hendryx at ginah@okbar.org or
(405) 416-7083; (800) 522-8065.
Originally published in the Oklahoma Bar Journal August
4, 2007 - Vol. 78; No.21. |